|
Comparison of a Closed with an Open Endotracheal Suction: A systematic review
|
|
| Author:
|
NEGINESMAILPOUR, PARVINREZAEI, SHOKOUHKABIRIANABYANEH
|
| Abstract:
|
Endotracheal suction is performed in open and close methods which are normally associated with different
complications and costs. The present study attempted to evaluate the effects of open and closed suctions on the
incidence of ventilator-dependent pneumonia, the impact on patient and staff safety, cost, and the hemodynamic status
of the patient using a systematic review. This study is a systematic review that by searching between English and
Persian language articles that published between January 1, 2000 and September 27, 2018. In order to identifying
articles related to suicide after natural disasters, we surfed Google Scholar, PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Science
Direct, Scopus, ProQuest, and CINAHL databases. This review was conducted on the basis of the provisions for
systematic and meta-analysis (PRISMA). A total of 1119 articles were selected. After screening, only 14 articles were
qualified to enter the study. Most of the selected studies introduced closed suction as safer and cheaper than open
suction. The proposed method is better to be used since most studies considered closed suction as more appropriate
in terms of ventilator-dependent pneumonia, the impact on patient and staff safety, cost, and the hemodynamic status
of the patient having less complications for patients and staff.
|
| Keyword:
|
Open suction, close suction, ventilator associated pneumonia
|
| EOI:
|
-
|
| DOI:
|
https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2019.11.04.048
|
| Download:
|
Request For Article
|
|
|