*Five Years Citation in Google scholar (2016 - 2020) is. 1451*   *    IJPR IS INDEXED IN ELSEVIER EMBASE & EBSCO *       

logo

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH

A Step Towards Excellence
Published by : Advanced Scientific Research
ISSN
0975-2366
Current Issue
Article In Press
No Data found.
ADOBE READER

(Require Adobe Acrobat Reader to open, If you don't have Adobe Acrobat Reader)

Index Page 1
Click here to Download
IJPR 9[3] July - September 2017 Special Issue

July - September 9[3] 2017

Click to download
 

Article Detail

Label
Label
Clinical Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Flowable Glass Ionomer Cement, Bioactive Glass and Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) In Class V Non-Carious Cervical Lesions.

Author: POOJA CHANDAK, MANOJ CHANDAK, CHETAN S. GODE
Abstract: Background- NCCL can also be described as cervical abrasion, erosion, and abfraction. It appears as shallow grooves or wedge-shaped lesions with sharp line angles. Materials like flowable “glass ionomer cement”, “bioactive glass”, and “zirconia reinforced glass ionomer cement” are used to restore these lesions. . Flowable “glass inomer cement” is available as a fluoride charged material. “Bioactive glass” possess antimicrobial properties, releases ions for remineralisation of tooth structure. It may act as strategic additive for dental restorative materials. “Zirconia reinforced glass ionomer cement” has a fluoride releasing ability hence, can be used in patients with high caries index. Method-45 subjects having non carious cervical lesions will be divided into three groups. The lesions will not be prepared with rotary instruments. Restoration will be done with three different materials. Follow up at 15 days,1 month and 3 months. Result- Restorations will be assessed by modified USPHS criteria for marginal integrity, restoration color stability and gingival inflammation. Conclusion- Literature has no studies comparing “flowable glass ionomer cement”, “bioactive glass” and “zirconia reinforced glass ionomer cement” with each other. Thus, purpose of the study is comparison and evaluation of “flowable GIC”, “bioactive glass”, and “Zirconia reinforced glass ionomer cement” in non-carious cervical lesions.
Keyword: Non carious cervical lesions, modified USPHS criteria, Flowable GIC, Bioactive glass, Zirconia reinforced GIC.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2019.11.02.210
Download: Request For Article
 




ONLINE SUBMISSION
USER LOGIN


Username
Password
Login | Register
News & Events
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
Refund Policy
Instrucations for Subscribers
Privacy Policy

Copyrights Form

0.12
2018CiteScore
 
8th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Google Scholar

hit counters free